There is something endearingly absurd about the cottage industry of World Cup prediction. Every four years, the sporting world briefly suspends its scepticism and asks whether a cephalopod, a parakeet or a passing porcupine might hold the key to the most coveted prize in football. After Paul the Octopus departed this world in 2010 having correctly called the winner of every match he was asked about during that summer's tournament in South Africa, the void he left behind proved difficult to fill. Leon the Porcupine, Anton the Tamarin and Petty the Pygmy Hippopotamus all tried and all fell short. The age of the animal oracle, it seemed, had closed.
And yet the spirit of prediction lives on — this time in rather more academic surroundings. Joachim Klement, a German mathematician, has been quietly doing something rather remarkable. By feeding a mixture of GDP per capita, population size, football culture, Fifa rankings and what he freely acknowledges as an element of luck into his calculations, he has correctly identified the World Cup winner three tournaments running: Germany in 2014, France in 2018, Argentina in 2022. His formula for 2026 points squarely at the Netherlands. One can only imagine Paul, up in his Octopus' Garden in the sky, extending a tentacle of approval.
The reaction on social media when Klement's prediction surfaced before the tournament was, to put it charitably, muted. The Dutch arrived in North America carrying a fair amount of baggage. Their defence had attracted scrutiny, a world-class centre-forward was conspicuously absent from the squad, the Eredivisie's decline in European standing had become a talking point, and the loss of Arne Slot to Liverpool's dugout left a certain air of uncertainty about the national set-up. There was also, of course, the matter of history: the Netherlands have reached three World Cup finals — in 1974, 1978 and 2010 — and lost the lot. Being nearly men is practically embedded in the national footballing identity at this point.
Turning Scepticism Into Belief
What Klement's model could not account for was the intangible shift that sometimes occurs when a team simply decides it is their time. The Netherlands have spent the group stage looking less like a side weighed down by expectation and more like one liberated from it. Seven points from their opening three matches, and ten goals scored in the process, has put them at the top of their section and silenced — at least temporarily — those who were quietly writing them off before a ball had been kicked.
Brian Brobbey has contributed three goals so far, offering at least a partial answer to the striker question that nagged at observers beforehand. Whether he can sustain that form into the knockout rounds remains to be seen, but the early evidence is encouraging. Should he go on to finish as the tournament's top scorer, Klement's reputation as a forecaster would be overshadowed only by whatever animal oracle might have tipped Brobbey for the Golden Boot before the competition began.
The Long Wait for Glory
Dutch football has always inspired a particular kind of romanticism — Total Football, the great Johan Cruyff sides, the class of 1988 who finally delivered a major trophy at the European Championship. But the World Cup has remained stubbornly out of reach. The market, for what it is worth, has historically been cautious about backing the Netherlands to go all the way, and public sentiment before this tournament was hardly clamouring for an Oranje coronation.
If Klement's calculations do prove correct, it will prompt a broader conversation about what predictive modelling can and cannot tell us about football. His variables — economic, demographic, cultural — are blunt instruments when applied to a sport so susceptible to a deflection, an injury or a moment of individual brilliance. But three consecutive correct calls is not noise. It is a pattern worth taking seriously.
Mani the Parakeet, the Singapore-based budgie who correctly predicted all four quarter-final results at the 2010 World Cup before backing the Netherlands to beat Spain in the final, would have approved of their current trajectory. Paul, of course, did not. And we all know how that ended. The Dutch will be hoping that, sixteen years on, the story finally has a different conclusion.
FAQs
Frequently asked
- How has the Netherlands done at World Cup 2026 so far?
- The Netherlands topped their group at World Cup 2026, winning seven points from three matches and scoring ten goals in the process.
- Who predicted the Netherlands to win the 2026 World Cup?
- German mathematician Joachim Klement predicted the Netherlands to win, using a formula based on factors including GDP per capita, population, football culture and Fifa rankings. The same model correctly identified Germany (2014), France (2018) and Argentina (2022) as winners.
- Who is Brian Brobbey and how has he performed at the 2026 World Cup?
- Brian Brobbey is the Netherlands striker who has scored three goals during the group stage of the 2026 World Cup, emerging as one of his side's key attacking threats.